Economy & Investments

Trump Sets Date for Major Tax Reform Announcement Next Week

President Trump declared on Friday that a major announcement on tax reform will be coming next Wednesday.

In setting the stage he prepped the reform with a top-down review of Obama administration tax policies, ostensibly as a part of his plan to undo many of them.

The big question is what tax reforms Trump will press on Congress that may run counter to his push for the border wall, health care reform and a massive infrastructure package.

The reforms could be dead on arrival.

Here’s more from Newsmax…

President Donald Trump on Friday promised a big announcement about tax reform next week and ordered an administration review of Obama-era tax rules written to discourage U.S. companies from relocating overseas to cut their tax bills.

“We’ll be having a big announcement on Wednesday having to do with tax reform. The process has begun long ago, but it really formally begins on Wednesday,” Trump said during a visit to the U.S. Treasury Department.

First reported in an Associated Press interview with Trump, the news came as a surprise to lobbyists and congressional aides who had no idea what Trump’s announcement might include.

In February, Trump promised to release a “phenomenal” tax plan within a few weeks, without offering details. But none emerged.

A White House official said the impending announcement could come later than Wednesday, adding: “The president was saying what we’ve been saying all along, that he wants to do tax reform as quickly as possible while still doing it right.”

Trump’s latest comments got a warm reception from the Republican tax chief in the House of Representatives.


Economy & Investments

Galiga: Wars & Rumors of Wars

In recent posts I discussed my projections that the Dow will blow past 20,000 and move on to as much as 30,000 in the near future as foreign investment capital continues to seek shelter in the American markets. I also detailed that major global events will be the most likely triggers that could derail that climb and expose the fact that there’s nothing under-pinning those markets except fear of worse markets abroad.

Over the last week we’ve seen a few perfect micro-examples of exactly how that could happen. As the Syrian civil war has continued to rage on with no end in sight, the rhetoric coming out of the Trump White House represented a notable change from rhetoric on the campaign trail from candidate Trump. Running in contrast to an Obama administration which itself had reversed its position on foreign entanglements from Obama’s rhetoric on the campaign trail, candidate Trump sounded as isolationist as any candidate in recent memory. But that all changed roughly a week ago when nearly five dozen Tomahawk missiles were fired from a U.S. navy warship into Syria.

With tension still on high between the U.S. and Russia and with no obvious resolution in Syria, the remaining questions are whether and when the next event in the Middle East will be met with another U.S. response and whether Russia will make good on its promise to respond militarily to any new actions from the U.S. The mere prospect of additional actions have ignited a new Cold War.

To make matters worse, North Korea’s nuclear saber rattling reached a fevered pitch in the anticipation of its annual ‘Day of the Sun’ celebration in which it routinely test-fires ballistic missiles in its ongoing pursuit of intercontinental nuclear weapons. With a U.S. Navy carrier group sent to the region and reports of Navy SEAL groups on the ground as well, the prospect of regional war is as imminent as it was in the run up to the invasion of Iraq under President George W. Bush in 2003.

Screen Shot 2017-04-17 at 2.56.31 PM

And just as we saw then we’ve seen the markets respond accordingly. Brent crude prices spiked in the days leading up to the attack on Syria and afterward. For anyone paying attention, profits on stock and options trades in fossil fuels were plentiful both on the front end and now on the back end this week with the opportunities to short those trades in front of the market micro-correction.

Depending on the timing, a similar escalation of military action running alongside the explosion of the Dow and other American markets would offer the same opportunities. In fact, a full-scale war, on the upside, and an ultimate ceasefire, on the downside, would offer massive profit baskets that pale last week’s opportunities in comparison.

As I explained previously, with fear and greed playing the critical role as primary drivers of investment decisions, global military instability creates opportunities like nothing else. This is true because military conflict shifts demand for fossil fuels and interrupts international trade agreements, both of which create huge ripple effects in secondary markets.

In the coming weeks I’ll be keeping a watchful eye on events in Venezuela, Syria and North Korea. Each of these hotspots present situations in which a massive shift in the status quo will be marked by market reactions within hours.

BY POPULAR REQUEST: We’ve received many emails from readers asking Mike for more information about how to profit in increasingly volatile markets… especially in the details of how to profit when markets are falling. We have a deluxe special report in the proofing stages that we’ll soon be making available to everyone interested in learning these valuable, wealth-building approaches. Not only can you learn to make money in falling markets but the same concepts can help you protect a bullish-biased portfolio against sizable losses in corrections. If you are interested in being among the first to receive this FREE report, be sure to email Mike at


Economy & Investments

Nobody Goes There, It’s Too Crowded – PT2

In Part 1 of this blog post I concluded with a lesson to be learned in how bubbles form in markets as small investors begin piling into a rapid growth scenario and that seeing this play out is a good time to back up and take a broader look at what’s going on. Let’s dig a little deeper into how this sort of bubble forms — and finally bursts.

Isolate a quantity of ‘anything’. Buyers buying that ‘anything’ starts driving up the price. Profit-minded investors see opportunity and join in. Prices continue higher. More people notice and buy in. Prices go still higher. More investors see easy money and pile on. This can continue for a long time — as long as buyers keep buying. However, if just about everyone who can buy is “all in” there is no amount of new news, hype, lies, spin etc that can bring any more buying into that ‘anything’. All buyers and all investors are pretty much all in. So what happens? The price stops rising. Investors get bored and decide to exit to chase something else. And only a little bit of selling can start making the price slide. What was once the hottest investment available can appear to sour and then more start bailing out. And more. And more. The price dives for no real fundamental or technical (forecasting) reason. It’s just a simple case of no more buyers to buy and some seller’s selling.

This reminds me of the joke about the woman who asks a friend for her thoughts on the hot, new restaurant in town. The friend responds, “Nobody goes there; it’s too crowded.” Indeed, when a stock or a market or an economy get too crowded, it’s usually a good sign to get out. One never wants to be the last buyer buying or the last seller selling. Especially technical analysis has a very hard time with market turns. Generally technical indicators revolve around the trend so an upward trend technically implies a continuation up and vice versa. This is the quant-driven seduction that eventually motivates the masses to be “all in” or “all out.” Once buying or selling power is exhausted, the trend turns but the systems just can’t foresee that. Instead, it takes the art side of a good trader to “smell” the change based on past experiences in similar scenarios.

And that is the sort of phenomenon we see unfolding before us right now. Behold the record recently set by U.S. investors which no one is talking about: index funds. An index fund is very simply a mutual fund comprised of a collection of stocks from a single index like the S&P 500 or the Dow Jones.

In the first two months of this year, investors dumped a record $131 billion into index funds according to ETFGI, LLP. That’s roughly a third of the total invested in index funds for the entire year in 2016. That, my friends, is what looks a great deal like the beginnings of a bubble. But let’s dig a little deeper and look at why this happens.

Since the election of Donald Trump to the presidency, world markets have reacted sharply and quite positively. Trump’s campaign rhetoric was very pro-business, pro-growth, pro-investment. So naturally, investors and business managers alike responded with anticipation of growth. And investment activity generally follows public attitudes of those at the top of the investor food chain. By another name that might be called “piling in.”

At the bottom of that food chain are individual, “mom and pop” investors. These are folks who might have a few thousand dollars to move around in the market and who, concerned largely with retirement, react very quickly and violently to trends in the economy. So when newspaper headlines are awash with great news about job records and growth, their reaction is quite predictable. If markets and indexes are growing, the easy money is to throw cash at funds which they expect will act like a surf board and ride the wave. That might be called “even more piling in.”

The problem, as I’ve pointed out in previous blogs, is that emotional investors get spooked very easily. There’s a sort of herd mentality among less sophisticated investors who don’t handle money in large quantities on a daily basis. And even the “mom & pop” investors are not so far removed from the last market crash that they have forgotten how quickly record highs can plunge to painful lows. When I talk to such investors — and when readers like you email me — I get a clear sense of lingering skepticism about confidence in this market, the economy, etc. As the unemployment number has fallen back toward a historically typical range, do we really believe that all those people found full-time, (good) jobs? Did all those retail establishments that were snuffed out in the great recession come back or do their slots in local commercial real estate still have “for lease” signs out front?

So here we have a challenging situation of more and more investors piling in to try to ride the new wave (or bubble?) with many of them more sensitive and even lacking trust to do so with confidence. With that in mind, it only takes a small trigger to get folks to consider pulling their money out. And when a few begin pulling, a lot take notice; that’s when the bubble bursts. We’ve seen it before and it is inevitable we will see it again. Markets at record highs don’t keep on achieving higher highs forever and ever. Eventually, they must correct. They always have, and they likely always will.

Per “the trend is your friend”, the trend-driven systems will only project higher highs. Following them means buy, buy, buy. Just as the flip-driven RE bubble encouraged exactly the same. Pile in. Get yours. Don’t miss out. The Jones’ are making a fortune in these markets, so why not you too? Realize those gains. Make it faster. More-more-more! Hurry. Let’s kill the goose and get ALL of the gold at once.

And then the goose is dead. No more gold. No more buyers. Bubble is bursting. Bubble has burst. Run for the exits.

So what to do about this? I’m not arguing that there’s no money to be made on the way to the top. No one knows where the top really is. But rest assured the longer the ride, the closer to the top we are and the sooner the crash will come. That’s why it’s important to be very picky about the stocks and options you keep on the way up and even more strategic about preparing for the ride down. Those require two completely different strategies, but big money can be made both ways.

Prepare yourselves. That means learning how to make money when the markets are falling. Do you understand how to short stock? Do you understand put options? Inverse ETFs? Do you know which is likely to be best for your own risk profile? These are all topics to know or get to know…ASAP. If you don’t know these well, speak up by emailing me and I can cover such knowledge in the near future.

In the meantime, while the fundamentals and technicals continue to encourage “buy, buy, buy” the art-side of my approach is growing caution. I smell a correction. There’s too many higher-highs at record levels for me to believe that records are just going to keep on coming. It never has before.

So do I think it’s time to sell now? No, my long-term views driven by science and art still forecasts DOW 30K in the next few years. But, in the shorter-term I’m more attracted to what might be called defensive or more bullet-proof investing opportunities. For instance, I’ve recently bought into in a very little-known robotics chip manufacturer. This company’s stock is already on pace to double in value in just a few months, and options on this stock are doing far better. No matter what the economy does, robotics technology is here to stay and will grow for the foreseeable future. Bullish plays in that kind of opportunity is where I want to take investing risks now.

If you believe record high markets do not automatically beget record high markets forever (if you lack enough life experience to know better, just take a look at any long-term chart of the DOW, S&P or similar, note record high points and then what follows soon thereafter), you might want to be thinking about those kinds of bear-resistant opportunities too. They facilitate continuing to ride the bull while lowering your risk exposure by focusing in on stocks likely be more resilient when the bear (correction) finally takes a big bite. Corrections tend to be fairly quick, often volatile and typically painful for those that are complacent or are lulled into a belief that bull markets are forever.

Again, if you would like me to delve into portfolio-protecting details, how to profit in bear markets and similar, email me at I write these articles based on reader input & questions so let me know what you want to see or learn.


Economy & Investments

Nobody Goes There, It’s Too Crowded – PT1

D19E7A0C-76C5-4980-BBBD-AB1BA2CEAB27-300x269Some of the smartest data crunchers and financial experts in the world have been among the most profoundly wrong when it comes to predicting what the markets will do in the short and long-term future. That’s because investing is as much about art as it is about science…intuition plus facts. If you are familiar with tech concepts like Moore’s Law or just apply some common sense of how the power of computing devices has amazingly evolved over the last 30+ years, one might conclude that a purely quant-based system is unlikely to ever get market forecasting right. I increasingly believe that to be the case.

Why? Because the markets are not purely driven by logic. There is no rigid formula that can always predict if a stock is going to rise or fall. I suspect the hunt for such a system is much like the cosmological hunt for the so-called “theory of everything” — a forever pursuit that never quite reaches a finish line…in spite of how smart our brightest intellects become and how rapidly the very best technology and tools they use evolves. It seems we should be about smart enough and well-equipped enough to solve both puzzles, but both may not be resolved with complex math alone. In short, both probably rely on more than can be deduced in formulaic computations.

With market forecasting, 1+1 can equal 3. Why? Because there is more to where things are going than just math, and even the most advanced AI algorithms have not yet been developed that completely factor in concepts like group emotions, sentiment, and “irrational exuberance”. How do I know this? As soon as anyone would have a perfect forecasting device, how long would it take them to become ruler of the financial world? Answer: almost no time at all. Do we have a sense of any such ruler now?

One may try to argue that the big banks play this role now, but there is competition there — no one bank is thoroughly dominating the others so much that it implies they have perfected a system. Could the owner of such a system hold back? They could, but that would conflict with a fundamental driver of all players in the markets: greed. Could a Goldman Sachs or Chase or Morgan Stanley resist the greed to make more money if all of their investments in cutting edge technology and the brightest brains had actually yielded a perfect system? I think not. Instead even Goldman, Chase and Morgan take their trading lumps from time to time.

Why? Again, there’s more to forecasting profitable plays than just logic-based algorithms. I am a firm believer that the best way to “beat the street” is to blend the fact and quant-oriented science one can apply to the task with the wisdom and experienced-driven art. Those who sell fundamental and technical analysis education products desperately want individual investors to believe that the path to profitable investing is entirely in finding a holy grail combination of technical indicators applied in some unique way. But I believe that’s seeing only a portion of a picture. And the whole picture depends on something as seemingly illogical as good “gut feel.”

Now, I believe there is a huge difference from random guessing, coin flipping, luck and chance and this kind of “gut feel.” For example, I would not encourage all investors to completely lean on their guts to make their investing decisions. This intuition I’m referring to is more about applying experience and leveraging wisdom from many years of observation. What makes a massive number of losers every day in the markets is not a bunch of naive people wild guessing about whether some stock is going to rise or fall. Some of them will have tried their very best, applying technically sound knowledge and leveraging systems to filter their investment selections from all possibilities down to a favored few. And yet, they still lose on some trades. Why? Because there’s more to it than fundamentals and technicals. And this wisdom and experience has its place (I actually believe at least an equal place with the fact-driven quant approaches).

I’m often asked how I would sum up my investing intuition and to what I would most credit my ability to make massive gains when so many are losing their shirts. And I boil it down mostly to a single attitude: watch what the masses do and then do the opposite. Many might tag this as being a contrarian and that basically fits. Make an assumption that the “herd” is wrong and act accordingly. Obviously making financial decisions is quite a bit more nuanced than that, but it’s one good bread rule to trade by — and one you should consider too. Think about the current investment picture. Where is the herd practically stampeding now?

Throughout the millennia as cultures and nations and technologies have changed radically, one thing has remained the same and will never change: human nature. And human nature reveals two driving sentiments in investing, fear and greed, which underpin nearly every emotional decision concerning money. It is eternal and the lessons that can be learned from the mistakes made by those who give in to fear and greed seem to be lost as one generation is replaced by the next.

How many people:

  • Know the ancient fable “The Goose That Laid the Golden Eggs”?
  • Know the moral of that story even from a young age? And yet,
  • Fail to apply it to their investing approach when they are old enough to know better?

So many of the “bubbles” referenced in the financial media reflect that. Just before the dramatic housing market collapse in the midst of the Great Recession, there was a massive bubble in which investors and homeowners wanted to jump in and ride the wave to a financial bonanza. They were not buying a home in which to live. They were not buying a home with an income goal by making it a rental. The game — the intoxication — was to buy a home with the intent to flip it (buy it, hold it for a while, then sell it at a higher price). And since it seemed to be working — even easily — for those early in that opportunity, more and more and more “investors” piled on.

The problem with bubbles is that few people realize, as they get high on the thrill of the ride, that they are in fact in a bubble. So when a bubble finally bursts — as all bubbles eventually do — it comes as a great shock to many of those involved. In short, individual investors see the wave swelling and greed compels them to jump in. As it reaches it’s climax- when they are killing that goose to try to get all of the gold at once- reality sets in. Then fear drives them to run for the hills after the crash, which makes the crash all the worse.

The lesson here is that when we see masses of individual investors and small advisers quickly buying up stocks, funds and ETFs, for instance, it’s probably a good time to stop and take a broader look at what everyone’s so excited about. Fundamentals and technicals may scream to keep riding the trend — just like they screamed to ride the Real Estate “flipping” trend barely a decade ago — but they are only right while more and more buyers keep piling in.

Stay tuned for Part 2 of this blog post as I delve a little deeper into how these bubbles form and ultimately go bust — and what you can do to prevent getting caught up in them. In the meantime, if you have particular questions about bubbles, stocks, options or topics you think I should cover, email me at



Economy & Investments, Politics

Econuts Freak After Trump Tries To Repeal Fracking Restrictions

Donald Trump has the potential to become the most pro-energy independence president in modern history with his unabashed support for American oil and gas companies.

As he moves to make good on his promise to reduce regulations on fracking, leftist tree hugging, econuts are predictably freaking out.

This week Trump ordered the EPA to look into undoing Obama’s ‘Clean Power Plan’ whose goal was to kill the coal industry and seriously hamstring oil and gas.

But not any more.

Here’s more from Redstate

Hydraulic fracturing or “fracking” is a process through which fluid is injected into deep underground shale deposits in order to release the natural gas contained within. President Obama strictly limited the amount of fracking that could be done on federal land, but now President Trump is trying to change that.

Trump has ordered the EPA to consider repealing Obama’s Clean Water Rule, and will soon seek to undo the Clean Power Plan, the coal leasing moratorium for federal land and other climate and environmental regulations.

Attorneys said the Interior Department and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) have been reviewing rules as part of a White House directive on reducing unnecessary and burdensome regulations.

Naturally Trump’s actions have done nothing to dislodge environmentalists from their default state of outrage.

“This disturbing decision highlights Trump’s desire to leave our beautiful public lands utterly unprotected from oil industry exploitation,” Michael Saul, an attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity, said in a statement. “Backing away from these modest rules is doubly dangerous given the administration’s reckless plans to ramp up fracking and drilling on public lands across America.”

Opposition to fracking seems to be based mostly on a dishonest “documentary” film called Gasland and the general desire among the greens to thwart any progress in the development of hydrocarbon energy sources.

The move comes as little surprise. The rule was a top target of the oil and natural gas industry as well as Republicans – all key allies to Trump.

The rule set standards in three areas for federal-land fracking: integrity of well casing, storage of waste fluids and public disclosure of the chemicals used.

It was written in part to respond to suspicion and anger from the public regarding the controversial oil and gas extraction technique, which has grown exponentially and been behind the boom in domestic energy production and resulting low prices.

Opponents have even tried to block infrastructure plans to make natural gas easier to export. Their gripes appear to be less about the alleged localized hazards of fracking—invented by Josh Fox in Gasland—than they are about the big boogeyman, global warming.

Once Interior finalizes its action to rescind the rule, it could be subject to litigation, including from environmental groups, states or others affected.

There’s no doubt there will be litigation. Tying every initiative up in court seems to be the left’s M.O. for the foreseeable future.


Economy & Investments

Between A Rock and A Hard Place

This week the members of the Federal Reserve Board met again to consider the nation’s monetary policy. And after years of multiple rounds of quantitative easing, rumors of a possible interest rate hike are finally more than mere speculation. The Fed’s decision to hike rates by 25 points is considered to be the first of many, which may lead to a full point.

Unexpectedly, markets responded as though the Fed had actually cut rates as investors, after a short selloff prior to the announcement, began buying again. And, but for some obvious profit-taking, they probably would have risen even further. This signals that the bullish mindset of most investors could stick around for awhile, which plays into my previous posts about a bubble scenario.

The problem with a rate hike by the Fed is that it puts them in a proverbial rock and hard place position. On the one hand, the U.S. is economy is exploding on the heels of the presidential election and the resultant pro-America policies of the Trump administration. And the Fed recognizes that the market is overly bullish and needs to cool down a bit to prevent another bubble like we saw leading up to the Great Recession. So a modest interest rate hike of 25 basis points is the obvious tool in the bag to achieve this.

On the other hand, the Board recognizes that the market generally responds very negatively after a rate hike is announced, particularly in markets that are directly impacted by interest rates such as the housing market. This means that if the Fed continues hiking rates, we’ll almost certainly see a drop in the markets this year. And it could threaten to completely undo the records set in recent weeks by the Dow.

But what’s worse about the prospect of a rate hike is two-fold. First, the Fed recognizes that the U.S. economy is still very much in recovery mode. Imagine a patient just emerging from massive heart surgery. While his recovery is looking great, if he starts rehabilitation exercises too soon, he could cause more damage than good. And that’s the sort of situation in which we find ourselves.

Second, as I’ve mentioned in previous posts, the major contributor to the massive uptick in the American markets are not internal fundamentals (those in many respects still remain weak) but external factors. The growing insolvency of the EU and the struggle of the Asian sectors are driving international investors to the U.S. in droves. This flood of money has fund managers in an unprecedented position where they are having difficulty finding enough investment vehicles to add to their portfolios.

Screen Shot 2017-03-16 at 5.18.03 PM

This global instability has added to it the ongoing and increasingly uncertain situation with North Korea and Iran. One minor flare up on the international stage could throw everything off kilter.

Imagine a scenario in which days or weeks after the Fed hikes interest rates for a second or third time, North Korea fires a missile into South Korea. Dominoes in the Asian theater start to fall as allies are pulled into the conflict on either side. Japan cannot escape the conflict, which upsets the trade balance with the EU. China must come to the defense of a fellow Communist nation, and suddenly we have a very large regional conflict on our hands.

The uncertainty that follows such an event will drive the market down as investors seek safer havens for their dollars until things settle down. That’s how quickly a wildly bullish market can turn to the bears.

But this uncertainty also offers unique opportunities with stocks and options provided the key indicators are clear. Catching those opportunities just before a major drop or spike in global markets is what separates the men from the boys. And such a separation is coming very soon, one way or another.


Economy & Investments, Media

OMB Director Mulvaney: Climate Change Research ‘Waste of Your Money’

The liberal media is foaming at the mouth after the Office of Management and Budget director Mick Mulvaney detailed for the White House press core all of the cuts President Trump is making in his budget.

Among them is cutting all funding for climate change research because…”it’s a wast of your money.”

His epic take down of the global warming agenda has liberals seething.

Here’s more from Breitbart

Thursday at the White House press briefing while answering questions about President Donald Trump’s “America First Budget,” Office of Management and Budget director Mick Mulvaney called climate change research “a waste of your money” regarding proposed cuts in that area.

Mulvaney said  “A couple of different messages, when we talk about science and climate change — let’s deal with them separately. On science, we’re going to focus on the core function. There are reductions in the NIH, National Institutes of Health. Why? Because we think there’s been mission creep, we think there are things outside their core function. We think there’s tremendous opportunity for savings. We recommend a couple of facilities can be combined and there is cost savings from that.”

“Again, this comes back to the President’s business person view of government, which is if you took over this as a CEO and you look at this on a spreadsheet, and you go, ‘Why do we have all of these facilities? Why do we have seven when we can do the same job with three? Won’t that save money?’” he continued. “The answer is yes. So the part of your answer is focusing on efficiencies and focusing on doing what we do better. As to climate change, I think the President was fairly straightforward saying we’re not spending money on that anymore. We consider that to be a waste of your money to go out and do that. So that is a specific tie to his campaign.”


Economy & Investments

Trump Boom: Third Longest Record in Growth, Jobs and Wages

Still in his first 100 days as president, Donald Trump is benefitting from the third longest period of growth in American economic history.

Buoyed both by investors’ confidence in an America-first policy and by the collapse of European and Asian markets, Trump’s America has done in one quarter what Obama couldn’t do in eight years.

Here’s more from Newsmax

U.S. employers hired workers at a robust pace in February, beating expectations, and wages grinded higher, which could give the Federal Reserve the green light to raise interest rates next week despite slowing economic growth.

Nonfarm payrolls increased by 235,000 jobs last month as the construction sector recorded its largest gain in nearly 10 years due to unseasonably warm weather, the Labor Department said on Friday. 

The economy created 9,000 more jobs in December and January than previously reported.

Fed Chair Janet Yellen signaled last week that the U.S. central bank would likely hike rates at its March 14-15 policy meeting. Job gains have averaged 209,000 per month over the past three months. The economy needs to create roughly 100,000 jobs per month to keep up with growth in the working-age population.

“By any measure this report is consistent with an exceedingly healthy labor backdrop and, I think more critically, it’s a number that will embolden the Fed to raise rates in March,” said Tom Porcelli, chief U.S. economist at RBC Capital Markets in New York.

U.S. short-term interest rate futures initially rose after the data, while prices of U.S. Treasuries pared earlier losses. U.S. stock index futures were trading higher, while the dollar was weaker against a basket of currencies.

Last month’s brisk clip of hiring was accompanied by steady wage growth, with average hourly earnings rising 6 cents, or 0.2 percent. January’s wage growth was revised up to 0.2 percent from the previous 0.1 percent gain. That lifted the year-on-year increase in wages to 2.8 percent from 2.6 percent in January.

The unemployment rate fell one-tenth of a percentage point to 4.7 percent, even as more people entered the labor market, encouraged by the hiring spree. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast employment increasing by 190,000 jobs last month.

Continue reading…


Economy & Investments

Trump Economy: Huge Jobs Boom in First Month

Whether analysts choose to credit President Trump directly or indirectly, one thing is clear: his first month in the White House has coincided with the largest gain in new jobs since the Great Recession.

Despite multiple fudged reports and claims of ‘jobs saved or created,’ Obama’s efforts to restore economic activity in the U.S. never compared to what happened last month.

Here’s more from Daily Mail

U.S. companies added a whopping 298,000 new jobs in February, beating economists’ expectations by more than 100,000.

The report from ADP, a global human resources and payroll firm, provides the first hard economic numbers from Donald Trump‘s first full month as president.

Trump tweeted a self-congratulatory note, calling the number ‘much more than expected!’


He also wrote Wednesday on Twitter about another similar measure, citing numbers from a new LinkedIn workforce report that showed strong job-adding numbers from January and February.

Those months ‘were the strongest consecutive months for hiring since August and September 2015,’ the president tweeted, mirroring the report’s language.

Construction jobs increased by 66,000 in February, and the manufacturing sector added 32,000.

Trump has pledged to dramatically improve the U.S. employment market in those sectors as he tries to lure businesses from overseas and stop jobs from fleeing across the border.

He has also promised $1 trillion in new infrastructure spending, another measure calculated to add jobs.

‘February proved to be an incredibly strong month for employment with increases we have not seen in years,’ Ahu Yildirmaz, vice president of the ADP Research Institute, said in a statement.

January’s new-jobs numbers were also revised upward on Wednesday from 246,000 to 261,000.

‘Confidence is playing a large role,’ Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Analytics, told CNBC.

‘Businesses are anticipating a lot of good stuff – tax cuts, less regulation. They are hiring more aggressively.’

The official U.S. unemployment rate is expected to shift downward from 4.8 per cent to 4.7 per cent, in response to the official jobs numbers report, due Friday.



Economy & Investments

This New Technology Will Change Everything…Again global macro-economics there are a million different things that can occur to profoundly affect exchanges around the world and how investors respond in their buying and selling behavior. In my most recent blog I detailed just a few of them as examples for why I believe the historic, record-setting Trump markets are due for a major correction. And now other trading experts are starting to say the same thing.

But every so often I like to pull back a bit and at take a microscope to key developments, usually in technology and processes, which mostly fly under the radar but which have the potential to profoundly change the way the developed world operates. Developments like these, if they ultimately go public, present massive opportunities to get in on the ‘ground floor’ as they say.

As an oil and gas attorney and former landman, I have a special place in my heart for energy development and exploration technology. And it’s not just for drilling and pumping but rather of energy development at-large, whether fossil-fuel based or alternative. And I have maintained for several years now that we’re on the cusp of a breaking point in which the battle for dominance between fossil fuels and alternative fuels will finally be over. And now I believe that point has come.

Global economic statistics demonstrate that as much as 60% of the world’s consumption of oil is due to gasoline production for combustion engines. In short, well over half of the oil used on the planet is for transportation. And with the recent oil glut over the last few years, the oil and gas industry has clawed its way back to solvency in the wake of over-supply and flagging demand.

The question on the astute investors’ minds is whether the oil and gas industry will ever see the sort of boom again with over $100 per barrel. I’ve argued for some time that the answer to that question is an unequivocal ‘no’. The problem is two-fold. First, technology and oil have a love-hate relationship. As new exploration technologies emerge which make oil exploration much cheaper, ever more exploration companies can afford to go into business, drill and pump oil and thus put more oil on the global market.

But therein lies the rub: more oil on the global market presents a classic supply and demand quandary. Greater supply means lower prices and therefore lower profits. And lower profits mean more oil and gas busts. And that’s why investors are looking for alternate energy sources. Not because oil is too expensive but because the long history of the oil and gas industry has been marked repeatedly by the boom and bust cycle like no other industry has.

What could be more stable than oil and gas? Not wind; it’s too sporadic and not efficient broad-based energy production. Salt-water and oceanic energy production is still too expensive and is also not efficient. But with new advancements in just the last couple years, solar energy production is finally reaching the point that was predicted decades ago.

New solar cells being developed in Australia, for instance, will offer the same energy development potential as a roof-top solar panel but in the space of just a few inches square. Similarly new solar roof tiles developed by Tesla cost roughly the same as a traditional asphalt roofing but with the added benefit that they generate electricity.

The greatest challenge, however, to solar energy production hasn’t been merely the efficiency of solar cells…it’s been the inefficiency and lack of capacity in energy storage via batteries. But that problem appears to be solved by the most likely of people.

For decades now the world has increasingly relied on batteries for our ever-growing wireless existence. And the convenience of wireless living rests on the back of battery storage capacity. When the lithium-ion battery was invented by engineer and professor at the University of Texas, John Goodenough, the world took a leap forward in that wireless existence. But lithium-ion batteries brought with them limitations of their own. In addition to having a relatively short lifespan after a certain number of cycles were exhausted, they also presented the threat of catching fire and even exploding.

But now Goodenough has solved the problem with his latest invention which I believe will change the world all over again. Goodenough has reinvented lithium-ion battery now with a solid-state technology which solves all the problems of its liquid-based predecessor. Using solid-state, glass electrolytes, the new battery will charge in a matter of minutes (or seconds in the case of mobile batteries), last longer, are non-combustible and have a much longer lifespan.

Why will this change the world? It’s simple. The greatest impediment to residential and commercial applications of solar energy production is storage and charging. But with Goodenough’s new lithium-ion technology, smaller batteries will store more energy, recharge faster, last longer and be much cheaper. Oil producers beware.

Googenough and his team are currently exploring opportunities to test the technology with companies who have the ability to make commercial applications. Translation: the new lithium-ion technology will be coming to a smartphone, electric car and home near you very soon. And when that happens, companies offering those batteries will see significant increase in related stocks and options.

This opportunity will be not unlike investing early in Ford Motor Company prior to the advent of the assembly line or in Bell Labs prior to the discovery of telephony. It will mark a major turning point in how the developed world consumes energy. And, take it from me, energy is what makes the world go ‘round.